Friday, November 22, 2013

On Ecosystem Services

Ecosystem services, they've been around for a while. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment has put ecosystem services on the radar of policy makers, and The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB ) is working hard to get natural capital accounting mainstreamed into national accounts. World Resources Institute has done some great work developing reports and methodologies that illustrate the relevance of ecosystem services for different sectors while giving actors in the public, private and non-profit sectors the tools to incorporate ecosystem services in their decision making and planning processes.

My research starts with these notions that the economy and the environment are inextricably linked. The broader environmental consequences of economic activities are often held up as a challenge to modernity. Looking around it is reasonable to wonder whether our current societal arrangements and orientation are somehow internally flawed and destined for extinction? A large and important question. However I am stepping into this problematic and accepting certain things as more or less constant in the nearer time frame. For me it is the dependency of economic activities on the environment that is of interest, and I have taken ecosystem services as my unit of analysis for examining these relationships.

Providing factors of production, transport of goods and receiving waste streams, the environment provides a range of essential and often non-substitutable goods and services to the economy. Some of these goods have market values while others are less easily incorporated within traditional economic analysis. There exists a substantial literature around the valuation of ecosystem services, with the primary aim of better characterising the joint environmental-economic system. Resilience, and in particular social-ecological resilience, is of increasing interest to scholars in this area.

My thesis work is three-fold: 1) to illustrate the importance of taking a step back and adopting the underlying ecological system as the basis for interpreting ecosystem services in the context of an environment-economy complex; 2) to argue the importance of cultural dimensions to the valuation of ecosystem services, both from a risk mitigation perspective, and in terms of intergenerational equity as a precondition for sustainable development; and, 3) to examine the political economy of watersheds and document how competition between various actors for access to the ecosystem services they need can affect the institutionalisation and implementation of water resources policy.

The goal is to publish these three research initiatives as individual papers – all success in that regard will be reported here – as well as to weave them together into a larger narrative. That second objective will be explored more in subsequent communications through this blog.



References

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment - http://www.unep.org/maweb/en/index.aspx


World Resources Institute - http://www.wri.org/
-        Weaving Ecosystem Services into Impact Assessment: http://www.wri.org/publication/weaving-ecosystem-services-into-impact-assessment
-        The Corporate Ecosystem Services Review: http://www.wri.org/publication/corporate-ecosystem-services-review

Arise old blog, arise !

Over the course of the last couple of years I have stepped back from this blog, largely because I have been back in learning mode, ploughing through coursework, comps, papers and proposals as part of ongoing work toward a PhD in Public Policy. What started out as a simple plan – get into some dedicated research space to work toward preconceived and specific goals, by way of carving out a professional niche – has turned into a great intellectual adventure. The original idea was to bring theory to years of practical experience in science-based water policy (which in turn was based on a technical foundation in water resources engineering). However the theory has opened up on all sides giving occasional glimpses of a sort of “superview”, as one colleague put it, of the public policy landscape; history, methods, disciplinary perspectives, processes, concepts and vocabularies, ideologies, institutions, actors, etc.


Now as the ideas pile up and connections continue to take shape it is time to write again. Indeed there has been a lot of writing along the way but now it’s time to pull out shorter pieces and take on documenting various aspects of the larger whole. At this point the objective will be to keep things relatively tight, and limited to key references, but that may change. I hope to provide a sense of how one piece fits within the larger picture, but the topic areas will be diverse, spanning from water and watershed governance to political philosophy to economic theory, through crosscutting institutional dimensions, and back again (and more), so tracing linkages between the many different dimensions will be neither easy nor complete, but hopefully it will be interesting.